{"id":65519,"date":"2025-09-24T09:55:11","date_gmt":"2025-09-24T13:55:11","guid":{"rendered":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/?p=65519"},"modified":"2025-09-26T13:41:14","modified_gmt":"2025-09-26T17:41:14","slug":"fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture","status":"publish","type":"post","link":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/","title":{"rendered":"Fully tempered glass and spontaneous fracture"},"content":{"rendered":"<figure id=\"attachment_65703\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-65703\" style=\"width: 225px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Opener-croppedjpg.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-65703 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Opener-croppedjpg-225x300.jpg\" alt=\"Nickel sulfide- (NiS) induced spontaneous fracture of fully tempered glass. Image courtesy Simpson Gumpertz &amp; Heger\" width=\"225\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Opener-croppedjpg-225x300.jpg 225w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Opener-croppedjpg-375x500.jpg 375w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Opener-croppedjpg.jpg 713w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 225px) 100vw, 225px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-65703\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Nickel sulfide- (NiS) induced spontaneous fracture of fully tempered glass.\u00a0<\/span><em><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><br \/>Photo courtesy Simpson Gumpertz &amp; Heger (SGH)<\/span><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p><em>This article was originally published in July 2018 by John A. Jackson and Thomas A. Schwartz. It has been refreshed and updated to further expand on the subject, including updates in industry standards and codes regarding the use of fully tempered glass in buildings, as well as the authors\u2019 ongoing experience and recommendations since its original publication. The article now also features a new third author, Christopher J. Brandmeier.<\/em><\/p>\n<p>It is a beautiful spring morning. Imagine sitting at a desk along the outside wall of an office, when all of a sudden, without warning, you hear a sudden pop. On looking up, you notice the glass in the wall next to you has shattered into thousands of small fragments.<\/p>\n<p>So, what happened? What caused the glass to break on its own? You likely witnessed a phenomenon known as spontaneous fracture of fully tempered glass, and unfortunately, you are not alone.<\/p>\n<p>Glass has a long and evolving history as a building material. In architectural facades, it not only expresses the aesthetic aspirations of a project, but also creates a compelling relationship of simultaneously separating and connecting the interior and exterior environments. In contemporary construction, architectural glass applications push the boundaries of the material\u2019s performance: acting as a structural element, providing thermal and acoustic separation, and regulating daylight and solar heat gain.<\/p>\n<p>To meet these demands, contemporary glass is highly customized through a series of manufacturing and fabrication processes to suit the specific architectural and technical requirements of a project. These include float glass production, where molten raw materials are transformed into flat glass sheets, and heat treatment, where glass is strengthened to meet safety and structural requirements. Additional processes such as application of low-emissivity (low-e) coating, ceramic frit, bird-friendly coatings, lamination, and assembly into insulating or vacuum insulating glass units (IGUs) further tailor the glass project needs.<\/p>\n<p>However, it is within float glass production and tempering ovens that the conditions for a potential serious issue, spontaneous fracture caused by nickel sulfide (NiS) inclusions, can arise. These small, seemingly benign NiS inclusions introduced during the float process, combined with the rapid cooling\/induced internal stress during glass tempering, and the subsequent exposure of the glass to heat in-service, create the potential for delayed, unpredictable breakage of fully tempered glass. Despite the industry&#8217;s recognition of this problem since the early 1960s and manufacturers&#8217; efforts to limit it, spontaneous fracture of fully tempered glass continues to be an issue in architectural glazing to this day.<\/p>\n<p>In this article, the authors will explore the different architectural glass types and strengthening methods, glass breakage behavior, why NiS inclusions form, and how they lead to spontaneous fracture of fully tempered glass. They will also review current industry practices and provide recommendations for risk mitigation.<\/p>\n<h2>Glass types and strengthening methods<\/h2>\n<h3>Glass types<\/h3>\n<p>Soda-lime silica glass is the most common type employed in architectural applications. It is produced from raw materials including silica sand, sodium carbonate (Na<sub>2<\/sub>CO<sub>3<\/sub>), lime, various metal oxides, and cullet (recycled glass). These ingredients are melted in a furnace at temperatures exceeding 1500 C (2700 F). The molten glass is then floated on a bath of molten tin, a process that gives rise to the term &#8220;float glass,&#8221; and slowly cooled in a controlled manner, or annealed, to minimize internal stresses.<\/p>\n<p>All float glass begins as annealed glass, but subsequent heat treatment (discussed further in the next section) can be applied to annealed glass to produce either heat strengthened or fully tempered glass:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Annealed glass (not heat treated, weakest strength)<\/li>\n<li>Heat-strengthened glass (heat treated, moderate strength)<\/li>\n<li>Fully tempered glass (heat treated, highest strength)<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Beyond strength, fully tempered glass offers a safety advantage over annealed and heat strengthened glass: when broken, it shatters into smaller, safer fragments compared to the alternatives and, therefore, is suited for meeting code requirements for safety glazing. However, these benefits come with trade-offs. Heat treated glass can exhibit increased optical distortion (<em>e.g.<\/em>\u00a0bow\/warp, roll wave, anisotropy) compared to annealed, and more critically, fully tempered glass suffers from an often-overlooked risk of spontaneous fracture during service.<\/p>\n<h3>Heat treatment<\/h3>\n<p>Glass, by nature, is strong under compressive forces but relatively weak under tensile forces. Heat treatment is used to strengthen annealed glass by introducing compression at the exposed surface of the glass, which offsets tensile stresses that can lead to breakage. This strengthening occurs during a carefully controlled heating and cooling process.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_65536\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-65536\" style=\"width: 400px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-1_Image-courtesy-of-Vitro-Architectural-Glass.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-65536\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-1_Image-courtesy-of-Vitro-Architectural-Glass.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"400\" height=\"249\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-1_Image-courtesy-of-Vitro-Architectural-Glass.jpg 750w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-1_Image-courtesy-of-Vitro-Architectural-Glass-300x187.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-1_Image-courtesy-of-Vitro-Architectural-Glass-500x311.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 400px) 100vw, 400px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-65536\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Figure 1: Illustration of internal stress profile of heat-treated glass. <\/span><br \/><em><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Illustration courtesy Vitro Architectural Glass<\/span><\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>In heat treatment, which occurs after glass is cut to size and its edges are finished, annealed glass is reheated to approximately 650 C (1200\u202fF) in a tempering oven, then rapidly cooled with high-velocity air jets in a process known as quenching. The rapid cooling locks the outer surfaces of the glass in place while the core remains hot and pliable. As the core gradually cools and contracts, it places the outer surfaces into permanent compressive stress, known as residual compressive surface stress (RCSS). To balance the forces from the compressed outer surface, the interior of the glass holds equal and opposite tensile stress (Figure 1). The glass after heat treatment can be thought of like post-tensioned concrete where the concrete is in compression and the post-tensioning strands inside are in tension.<\/p>\n<p>The faster the cooling, the greater the level of RCSS. According to ASTM C1048, <em>Standard Specification for Heat-Strengthened and Fully Tempered Flat Glass<\/em>, the minimum residual compressive surface stress for heat treated glass is:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>24,132 to 51,711 kPa (3,500 to 7,500 psi) for heat-strengthened glass<\/li>\n<li>68,948 kPa (10,000 psi) for fully tempered glass<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>This outer compressive layer protects the heat treated glass against surface flaws (which can lead to stress concentrations as discussed in the next section) and applied tensile stresses (<em>e.g.<\/em> due to bending from wind loads), significantly enhancing its overall strength and durability.<\/p>\n<h2>Glass design strength and breakage behavior<\/h2>\n<h3>Glass strength<\/h3>\n<p>Glass is a brittle material, meaning, unlike other ductile materials such as metals, glass fracture is often sudden\u2014without yielding, significant deformation, or warning. As is typical with brittle materials, the effective strength of glass is governed by the presence of surface flaws, which act as stress concentrators. These flaws form naturally during manufacturing, from handling and installation, and from in-service weathering of the glass, and their effects are addressed in engineering design standards. Since maximum bending stresses occur at the glass surface, where flaws are most likely to occur, the introduction of surface compressive stress through heat treatment effectively counteracts these potential stress concentrations on the glass surface and significantly improves its load resistance.<\/p>\n<p>Stress-concentrating flaws occur randomly and can vary significantly from one glass lite to another, so glass strength is defined statistically, using statistical probability of breakage (SPB). This results from the statistical probability surface flaws will be present, and the ability of these flaws to concentrate applied stresses, leading to fracture under load. The common industry design standard for SPB of architectural glass upon first application of the design load (<em>e.g.<\/em> wind load) is eight lites per 1000 (8\/1000). A designer may select a lower SPB, say 1\/1000, for applications such as overhead glazing (<em>e.g.<\/em> glass sloped 15 degrees or more from vertical) and other critical \u201cstructural\u201d applications (<em>e.g.<\/em> drilled, point-supported, or clamped glass). ASTM E1300 and other glass engineering design standards provide methods for design of architectural and structural glass, which accounts for the SPB and glass heat treatment.<\/p>\n<p><!--nextpage--><\/p>\n<h3>Glass fracture<\/h3>\n<figure id=\"attachment_65537\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-65537\" style=\"width: 401px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-4_Image-courtesy-of-Simpson-Gumpertz-Heger.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-65537\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-4_Image-courtesy-of-Simpson-Gumpertz-Heger.jpg\" alt=\"Starburst pattern of fractured, fully tempered glass. The circle indicates fracture origin. Images courtesy Simpson Gumpertz &amp; Heger\" width=\"401\" height=\"335\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-4_Image-courtesy-of-Simpson-Gumpertz-Heger.jpg 800w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-4_Image-courtesy-of-Simpson-Gumpertz-Heger-300x251.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-4_Image-courtesy-of-Simpson-Gumpertz-Heger-768x641.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-4_Image-courtesy-of-Simpson-Gumpertz-Heger-500x418.jpg 500w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 401px) 100vw, 401px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-65537\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Figure 2: Starburst pattern of fractured, fully tempered glass. The circle indicates fracture origin. <\/span><br \/><span style=\"font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\"><em><span style=\"font-size: 10pt;\">Photo courtesy Simpson Gumpertz &amp; Heger<\/span><\/em><\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Glass fracture can occur due to a variety of reasons, such as impact (accidental or otherwise), pre-existing glass damage (<em>e.g.<\/em> at edges) which may compromise the ability of the glass to resist design loads, glass binding or glass-to-metal contact within the frame, damage from construction activities such as weld splatter, or overstress from applied loads (<em>e.g.<\/em> wind, thermal) to due improper design, fabrication, and\/or installation.\u00a0Spontaneous fracture is a term for the sudden breakage of glass without any apparent external stress; most commonly due to inclusions within the glass of which the most common is nickel sulfide (NiS).<\/p>\n<p>When fully tempered glass breaks, the residual tension built into the glass core drives cracks throughout the plate explosively, producing a diced fracture pattern. If the fragments do not immediately leave the opening upon breakage, one can see a series of primary cracks radiating from the point of origin, in what is commonly called a \u201cstarburst\u201d pattern (Figure 2).<\/p>\n<h2>Nickel sulfide (NiS) formation, spontaneous fracture mechanism, and identification<\/h2>\n<h3>NiS formation in architectural glass<\/h3>\n<p>Impurities can be introduced into glass during the melting of the raw ingredients in the furnace at the float plant. Many impurities are benign, but nickel sulfide (NiS) can be problematic.<\/p>\n<p>The sulfur in NiS commonly derives from sodium sulfate (Na<sub>2<\/sub>SO<sub>4<\/sub>), employed as a fining agent in the molten glass mixture typically used to reduce the presence of air bubbles. There is debate within the industry as to exactly how nickel is introduced into the mix, but several known causes include:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>contamination of raw materials<\/li>\n<li>abrasion of the storage\/handling equipment of raw materials releasing nickel-bearing metals such as stainless steel<\/li>\n<li>the inside surfaces of the furnace itself<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Most float glass manufacturers are aware of the risks of contamination and include details within their quality assurance\/control (QA\/QC) procedures for minimizing contamination.<\/p>\n<p>NiS is an unusual compound because it has different high\u00ad and low-temperature crystalline structures, namely the alpha phase (<em>i.e.<\/em> high temperature, greater density, smaller volume, and less stable crystalline structure) and beta phase (<em>i.e.<\/em> low temperature, less dense, larger volume, and more stable crystalline structure). The cumulative effect of heat causes NiS particles to transition from the alpha to the beta phase. During the rapid cooling process of tempering, the NiS particle may be locked into its smaller, but less-stable alpha phase. (The slow cooling process for annealed glass can allow the NiS particle to transform from the alpha phase to the more-stable beta while the material is still soft and has the ability to accommodate the inevitable expansion without adverse consequences.)<\/p>\n<h2>The mechanism of NiS-induced spontaneous fracture<\/h2>\n<p>If the NiS particle is locked in its alpha phase during the tempering process, it can eventually transition to the more stable beta phase under the long-term accumulation of in-service heat from external sources such as the sun or heating systems of the building. When this occurs in a particle located within the mid-plane of the glass, its expansion, in conjunction with the residual tensile stress surrounding it, can propagate a micro crack or \u201cvent\u201d in the glass. When the vent reaches a critical length, the residual tensile stress in the glass core causes the crack to propagate throughout the lite and fracture spontaneously.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_65800\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-65800\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Fig3.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-65800 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Fig3-300x201.jpg\" alt=\"Figure 3: View of \u201ccat eye\u201d fragments at fracture origin (arrows), typical of NiS-induced fracture of fully tempered glass. NiS inclusion (circled) along the mid-plane of the glass.\" width=\"300\" height=\"201\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Fig3-300x201.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Fig3-768x514.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Fig3-500x334.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Fig3.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-65800\" class=\"wp-caption-text\"><span style=\"font-size: 10pt; font-family: arial, helvetica, sans-serif;\">Figure 3: View of \u201ccat eye\u201d fragments at fracture origin (arrows), typical of NiS-induced fracture of fully tempered glass. NiS inclusion (circled) along the mid-plane of the glass. <em>Photo courtesy Simpson Gumpertz &amp; Heger (SGH)<\/em>\u00a0<\/span><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>NiS-induced fractures show these characteristics:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>Two distinctive glass fragments at the fracture origin have a unique shape (roughly hexagonal or pentagonal) and are generally larger than the other fragments. This is often referred to as the \u201ccat-eye,\u201d \u201cbutterfly,\u201d or \u201cfigure eight\u201d pattern (Figure 3).<\/li>\n<li>The NiS inclusion is visible at the mid-plane of the fractured interface between the two cat-eye fragments (Figure 3). The inclusion, or \u201cstone,\u201d is spherical and approximately 0.1 to 0.2 mm (4 to 8 mils) in diameter.<\/li>\n<li>No apparent sign of localized crushing of the glass surface at the fracture origin (surface crushing indicates potential impact).<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>As discussed previously, all float glass (including annealed, heat-strengthened, and fully tempered) may contain NiS impurities. However, NiS-induced fracture occurs only in fully tempered glass. The authors are not aware of any incidents of spontaneous fracture attributed to NiS in annealed or heat-strengthened glass, as long as the heat-strengthened glass has its RCSS within the limits (<em>i.e.<\/em> 24,132 to 51,711 kPa) set forth in ASTM C1048. One of the reasons for limiting the RCSS of heat-strengthened glass to this range is to provide a moderate level of strength increase over annealed glass, but limit the RCSS safely below the minimum RCSS of 68,948 kPa of fully tempered glass at which NiS-induced fracture is known to occur. The authors have found NiS-induced fractures in glass with RCSS at 56,537 kPa (8200 psi) or above. This level of RCSS provides sufficient residual tensile stress around a NiS particle, located mid-plane, to propagate fracture if and when the impurity undergoes its phase transformation.<\/p>\n<h3>Non-destructive detection of NiS<\/h3>\n<p>In-place, non-destructive test methods for identification of NiS inclusions in fully tempered glass, which could eventually lead to spontaneous fracture, are generally impractical in large-scale manufacturing processes or in-service applications. Several methods have been tried for locating NiS inclusions on in-service glass (<em>e.g.<\/em> ultrasound, laser imaging, photographic, and light detection), in the hope of identifying potential inclusions before they break the glass. These methods are labor intensive, time consuming, expensive, require specialized equipment, and highly prone to user error. Even if an inclusion is found near the mid-plane of the glass, the crystalline state of the NiS is still unknown. So, one does not know if the phase transformation has already taken place and whether the inclusion is benign or not.<\/p>\n<h3>Post-fracture testing and verification of NiS<\/h3>\n<figure id=\"attachment_212664\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-212664\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-4-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-212664 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-4-300x161.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"161\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-4-300x161.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-4-500x268.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-4-768x411.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-4-scaled.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-212664\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 4: Zoomed-in view of NiS inclusion when viewed in a scanning electron microscope (SEM). SEM energy dispersive X-ray spectrometer (EDS) identifies the elemental composition of the inclusion including nickel and sulfur. <em>Image courtesy Simpson Gumpertz &amp; Heger (SGH)<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>The classic signs of a NiS-induced break (<em>e.g.<\/em>\u00a0the distinctive \u201ccat-eye\u201d fragments at the fracture origin and no apparent localized crushing of the outer surface of the glass that might indicate an impact) are often insufficient to positively identify a break for a warranty claim. To determine conclusively the cause of breakage was NiS inclusion, the cat-eye glass fragments should be tested in a laboratory (Figure 4).<\/p>\n<p>If NiS-induced spontaneous fracture is suspected, it is crucial to identify the fracture origin and preserve it for further forensic testing. This is true even if testing is not readily available or the breakage has not yet become a regular occurrence. Too often in the authors\u2019 experience, spontaneous breakage occurs on a building before the owner becomes aware of a pattern of breakage, and the glass origin fragments that would have positively verified NiS-induced fracture and the extents of the issue as well as triggering warranty claims are no longer available.<\/p>\n<p>Whenever spontaneous glass breakage is suspected, it is first critical to make safe the area around the broken glass to minimize risks potential injury (<em>e.g.<\/em> notification of building staff, cordoning off the area nearby and below the glass). Preservation of a fracture origin, typically includes documenting the break in-situ with photographs, carefully applying a clear tape or film to at least a 152 x 152 mm (6 x 6 in.) area around the origin (<em>i.e.<\/em>\u00a0the center of the starburst pattern), and finally carefully removing the fragments as a contiguous sheet, making sure to retain the \u201ccat eye.\u201d Other glass from the broken panel can be safely discarded, typically by an experienced glazing contractor.<!--nextpage--><\/p>\n<h2>Risk due to NiS-induced spontaneous fracture<\/h2>\n<h3>Safety risks to building occupants and the public<\/h3>\n<p>The risks of injury due to falling glass fragments can vary depending upon the height of the glass and location relative to people. Clearly, there is a different level of risk of injury or property damage associated with glass fallout from several stories above a busy sidewalk compared to fallout from an interior glass partition directly adjacent to building occupants. Note, the <em>International Building Code<\/em> (<em>IBC<\/em>) recognizes reduced risk of falling fragments of fully tempered monolithic glass within 3 m (10 ft) of a walking surface for sloped and overhead glazing (<em>IBC<\/em> 2015 Section 2405.3.1). Ultimately designers need to exercise careful judgement in glass selection to minimize project-specific risk.<\/p>\n<h3>Extents of contamination and duration of breakage events<\/h3>\n<p>Float glass is manufactured in large batches, often with float stock produced at a single facility. Although the percentage of buildings experiencing spontaneous breakage of fully tempered glass due to NiS inclusions is low, if a batch of glass is contaminated, the incidence of breakage on a particular building can be quite high. The probability of NiS-induced fracture in each population of fully tempered glass is unpredictable because of many variables such as:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>the likelihood and quantity of contaminates in the furnace<\/li>\n<li>the potential location of inclusion within the tension zone of the glass<\/li>\n<li>the probability of the NiS occurring in the less-stable alpha phase<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Once fracture occurs, the possibility of the glass fragments remaining in place (<em>i.e.<\/em> retained in the frame) is also unpredictable and dependent on a variety of factors including, but not limited to:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>size and thickness of glass<\/li>\n<li>exposure to post-fracture lateral forces such as from air movement (<em>e.g.<\/em> wind)<\/li>\n<li>magnitude of energy release during fracture (a function of magnitude of residual stress built into the glass)<\/li>\n<li>location of NiS inclusion within the glass<\/li>\n<li>presence of laminating interlayers<\/li>\n<li>adhesion\/stiffness of glass retention by the perimeter frame<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>Therefore, unless the fractured lite is laminated to an unbroken lite, there is no definitive set of circumstances under which one can feel confident the fragments will be retained in place after fracture. Additionally, although a laminated sheet of glass retains the fractured lite, the laminated lite will no longer have the same stiffness or resistance to in-service loads.<\/p>\n<h3>Industry practice to mitigate risk<\/h3>\n<p>It has been recognized in the architectural glass industry for decades that fully tempered glass can fracture spontaneously due to the presence of NiS impurities. For this reason, major glass manufacturers have advised that fully tempered glass should be avoided in applications where a fracture and glass fall-out pose a substantial risk of harm to people or property. A major glass manufacturer addressed this issue in a technical bulletin, first published in 1988. In this document, the manufacturer confirmed this inherent susceptibility of fully tempered glass to spontaneous breakage in-service, and refused to knowingly supply monolithic, fully tempered glass for \u201cstreet wall\u201d applications.<\/p>\n<h3>Limiting the use of fully tempered glass<\/h3>\n<figure id=\"attachment_212667\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-212667\" style=\"width: 193px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-5.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-212667 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-5-193x300.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"193\" height=\"300\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-5-193x300.jpg 193w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-5-322x500.jpg 322w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Figure-5.jpg 644w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 193px) 100vw, 193px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-212667\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 5: Safety Glazing in Openings Exception, IBC 2024 Commentary Figure 2406.4.3. <em>Diagram courtesy International Code Council (ICC)<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Industry practice is to limit the use of fully tempered glass to only locations required by code. The National Glass Association (NGA\u2019s) GANA Glazing Manual is the industry standard for the design, fabrication, and installation of glass and warns of the risk of NiS-induced spontaneous breakage of fully tempered glass and advises:<\/p>\n<p>\u201cThe potential risk of spontaneous breakage associated with nickel sulfide inclusions can be minimized by using heat-strengthened glass due to the lower stresses in heat-strengthened glass. Where fully tempered glass is not required by building codes (safety glazing, fire breakouts, etc.) and\/or design loads, heat-strengthened glass is normally the preferred product.\u201d<\/p>\n<p>In some cases, fully tempered glass is mandated by the building code (<em>e.g.<\/em> safety glazing and in some jurisdictions, fireman knock-out panels) or required for strength (<em>e.g.<\/em> to resist high thermal stress or tension due to design loads), as is often the case for point-supported and other similar \u201cstructural\u201d glass applications as a result of high tensile stresses around the anchors and glass fittings.<\/p>\n<p>Despite these requirements, building codes are adapting to further limit prescriptive use of fully tempered glass. For example, Exception 3 in <em>IBC<\/em> 2024 Section 2406.4.3 (Figure 5) exempts the exterior lite of multi-lite glass units with bottom exposed edge 2.44 m (8 ft) or more above the adjacent walking surface from safety glazing requirements, substantially reducing the application of fully tempered glazing on building facades compared to prior editions. The 2.44 m (8 ft) dimension is an important revision from the long-standing 7.6 m (25 ft) dimension in previous editions of <em>IBC<\/em>.<\/p>\n<p>Designers can also employ Exception 2 in 2024 <em>IBC<\/em> Sec. 2406.4.3 to provide a horizontal rail inboard of a hazardous location (<em>e.g.<\/em>\u00a0a floor-to-ceiling vision glass application) to eliminate the need for safety glazing (Figure 6). A horizontal rail can often be incorporated directly into the glazing system with minimal visual implications.<\/p>\n<figure id=\"attachment_212656\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-212656\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-6-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-212656 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-6-300x281.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"281\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-6-300x281.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-6-500x469.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-6-768x720.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-6-scaled.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-212656\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 6: Guard rail (arrow) at interior of glazed aluminum curtain wall, in compliance with safety glazing exemptions.<br \/><em>Photo courtesy Simpson Gumpertz &amp; Heger (SGH)<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Laminated glass is another alternative to monolithic fully tempered glass to meet safety glazing requirements. Laminated glass can also enhance the post-breakage performance compared to monolithic glass. Building codes reflect this practice, for instance the 2015 <em>IBC<\/em> and later editions explicitly requires the use of laminated glass in structural glass handrails and guards unless \u201cthere is no walking surface beneath them or the walking surface is permanently protected from the risk of falling glass.\u201d Note, laminated glass often comes at a cost premium compared to monolithic fully tempered glass and therefore its cost-benefit should be evaluated on a case-by-case basis.<\/p>\n<p>Beyond evaluating the need for safety glazing, it is important to not accept use of monolithic fully tempered glass without also reviewing structural and thermal stress calculations, confirming it is, in fact, required, as one may be taking on unnecessary risk in employing fully tempered glass when heat-strengthened glass would suffice. Additionally, fully tempered glass is sometimes produced in lieu of heat-strengthened for convenience and\/or for economic reasons, and not because of code or strength requirements. In any case, design professionals should not accept monolithic fully tempered glass unless its requirement for the project is proven.<\/p>\n<p>In these cases, where monolithic, fully tempered glass is unavoidable, major glass manufacturers have advised and industry practice suggests glass should be heat-soak tested as a means to reduce the risk of in-service breakage due to NiS inclusions.<\/p>\n<table border=\"0\">\n<tbody>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 5px; text-align: center;\" bgcolor=\"#67be49\"><span style=\"color: #ffffff;\"><strong>DISPELLING MYTHS ABOUT SPONTANEOUS FRACTURE<\/strong><\/span><\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<tr>\n<td style=\"padding: 5px;\" bgcolor=\"#eef6dd\">The terms discussed regarding fully tempered glass, spontaneous fracture, and heat-soak testing can be confusing. This has led to misinformation, false claims, and myths as discussed and clarified below.<\/p>\n<p><em>Myth #1: If glass on a project has a statistical probability of breakage (SPB) of 8\/1000, one should expect to have eight broken lites of glass for every <\/em><em>1000 pieces of glass on the building during construction or in-service.<br \/>\n<\/em>Not true (and not even close). The common industry design standard for SPB of architectural glass on first application of the design load is 8\/1000. This relates to the structural design of the glass and is not related to probability of breakage due to material impurities (<em>e.g.<\/em> NiS) or other potential causes of glass breakage (<em>e.g.<\/em> impact), which may occur during construction or in-service.<\/p>\n<p><em>Myth #2: Heat-soak testing reduces SPB from 8\/1000 to 5\/1000.<br \/>\n<\/em>Not true. As discussed, SPB of 8\/1000 relates to the structural design of the glass. The 5\/1000 or 0.5 percent describes the terms of some glass manufacturers\u2019 warranties to pay for replacement of heat-soak tested, fully tempered glass that breaks in-service. This warranty limit is a commercial decision made by manufacturers and should not be compared to or confused with the SPB of 8\/1000.<\/p>\n<p><em>Myth #3: Heat-soak testing eliminates all risks of spontaneous breakage of fully tempered glass in-service.<br \/>\n<\/em>Not true. When carried out properly in accordance with EN-14179, heat-soak testing significantly reduces, but does not eliminate the risk of NiS-induced fracture in-service.<\/p>\n<p><em>Myth #4: Foreign-sourced float glass is at higher risk of NiS contamination compared to domestically-sourced glass.<br \/>\n<\/em> Not true. The author\u2019s experience shows that both foreign-sourced and domestically-sourced float glass both suffer from NiS contamination alike.<\/p>\n<p><em>Myth #5: NiS-induced spontaneous fracture of fully tempered glass <\/em><em>runs its course in the first three to seven years, after which breaks will eventually stop.<br \/>\n<\/em>Not necessarily true. There are too many variables determining the rate and longevity of NiS-induced breakage to substantiate this prediction. The major factors are the crystalline state of the NiS inclusion at the time of tempering (highly variable) and the rate and magnitude of heat that can eventually trigger the phase transformation and breakage. The authors\u2019 experiences with buildings containing fully tempered glass suffering from NiS-induced fractures shows some buildings experience a diminution in the rate of breakage over time (as would be expected by simply culling the population of contaminated glass), while others continue to experience NiS-induced breakage at a relatively steady rate for a much longer period of time, and in some cases, decades.<\/td>\n<\/tr>\n<\/tbody>\n<\/table>\n<p><!--nextpage--><\/p>\n<h3>Heat-soak testing<\/h3>\n<figure id=\"attachment_212657\" aria-describedby=\"caption-attachment-212657\" style=\"width: 300px\" class=\"wp-caption alignright\"><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-7-scaled.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"wp-image-212657 size-medium\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-7-300x225.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"300\" height=\"225\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-7-300x225.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-7-500x375.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-7-768x576.jpg 768w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Figure-7-scaled.jpg 1024w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 300px) 100vw, 300px\" \/><\/a><figcaption id=\"caption-attachment-212657\" class=\"wp-caption-text\">Figure 7: Fully tempered glass after heat-soak testing. Some of the glass remains unbroken (<em>i.e.<\/em> has passed the test), whereas some has fractured as result of the NiS-inclusion phase transformation during heating in the furnace.<br \/><em>Photo courtesy Agnora<\/em><\/figcaption><\/figure>\n<p>Heat-soak testing is a process whereby fully tempered glass is heated in a made-for-purpose heat soaking furnace and held at a specific temperature for a period of time to induce any NiS inclusions to undergo their phase transformation, and thus break the glass during the test in the furnace rather than on the building in-service (Figure 7).<\/p>\n<p>There is currently no North American standard for heat soak testing. Some companies in North America perform heat soak testing in accordance with EN 14179-1, <em>Heat Soaked Thermally Toughened Soda Lime Silicate Safety Glass<\/em> or ISO 20657, <em>Glass in building\u2014Heat soaked tempered soda lime silicate safety glass<\/em>, which generally includes the following requirements:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>dwell temperature of 260 C (500 F) +\/- 10 C (18 F) (<em>i.e.<\/em> temperature below the annealing point at which the RCSS from tempering could be reduced)<\/li>\n<li>dwell time of two hours, commencing when all of the glass surfaces have reached the required temperature<\/li>\n<li>separation of glass panes without hindering airflow (<em>e.g.<\/em> minimum 20-mm [0.8-in.] gap between panes) to ensure even heat distribution around the glass surfaces<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<p>When carried out properly in accordance with EN-14179, heat-soak testing significantly reduces, but does not entirely eliminate, the risk of NiS-induced fracture in-service. The authors\u2019 experience with NiS-induced breakage over the last 45 years shows a handful of isolated example of NiS-induced fractures in fully tempered glass panels that were reported to be heat-soak tested. While heat-soak testing is effective in reducing the risk of in-service spontaneous breakage due to NiS impurities, it is an imperfect process that requires careful quality control, and is not a guarantee. Further, heat-soak testing adds another step to the manufacturing process and comes at additional cost and production time. The spontaneous breakage in the furnace can also damage adjacent unaffected glass panels during the test. Also note, when heat soak tested properly, there should be a minimal-to-no effect on the surface compression of the fully tempered glass.<\/p>\n<p>Some manufactures provide warranties to replace glass broken in-service due to verifiable NiS inclusions if the glass was heat-soak tested, and the breakage exceeds a certain percentage (<em>e.g.<\/em> greater than three lites per 1000 or 0.3 percent of the total number of glass panels). In this case, on a building with 400 glass panels, the owner is responsible for paying for the replacement of the first broken lite, and every other broken panel thereafter would be covered by the manufacturer. These warranties typically include the cost of the replacement glass material for a period of up to 10 years, however may or may not include installation labor which can be a significant cost of glass replacement, so should be reviewed carefully. These warranties, however, often do not cover mitigation or remediation measures (<em>e.g.<\/em> adding protective film to unbroken glass panes to help hold fragments in place in case future breakage occurs) or consequential injury\/damages to people and property associated with spontaneous glass breakage.<\/p>\n<p>A critical first step to reduce both risk and cost is to minimize the use of fully tempered glass in the first place. For example, if a high-rise, all glass curtain wall building is specified with all fully tempered, heat-soak tested glass, the risk of contamination is highest and price to heat soak all the glass would similarly be quite high. However, if the fully tempered glass is minimized to only where required (<em>e.g.<\/em> utilizing the safety glazing code exception[s] as discussion earlier), a significant percentage of the glass can be heat strengthened instead of fully tempered, thereby substantially reducing the risks of NiS-induced fracture and the cost of heat soak testing. Further, the costs for heat soak testing in North America has generally come down over recent years as more domestic glass manufacturers have upgraded production lines to now offer heat soaking.<\/p>\n<p>Heat soak testing is becoming more common across the North American industry and is even required in some other countries. Many owners (including their funding sources, lenders, and insurance companies), architects, consultants, general contractors, and glazing contractors require that all fully tempered glass on their projects be heat soak tested, full stop. This is especially true for parties who have experienced NiS-induced breakage on their projects, which in some cases has resulted in significant financial and commercial hardship (including replacement of all glass suspected to be contaminated on the buildings), and they wish to minimize the potential for a repeat occurrence. Internationally, Australia\u2019s <em>National Construction Code <\/em>(<em>NCC<\/em>), for example, requires heat soak testing glass in buildings when monolithic fully tempered glass is glazed more than 5m (16.4 ft) above a walking surface and the area below is not protected by a balcony or awning (refer to section 3.8 of AS 1288, <em>Glass in Buildings \u2013 Selection and Installation<\/em>).<\/p>\n<h2>Recommendations<\/h2>\n<p>The authors recommend consideration of the following when specifying glass on projects.<\/p>\n<p>Use heat-strengthened glass at exterior applications wherever allowable for strength, as it provides greater strength to resist structural loads and thermal stress when compared to annealed glass, without the risk of spontaneous fracture and likelihood of post-fracture glass fall-out associated with fully tempered glass.<\/p>\n<p>Understand the safety glazing requirements of Section 2406.4.3, <em>Glazing in Windows<\/em>, of the <em>IBC<\/em> 2024, and employ code exceptions to minimize the use of fully tempered glass.<\/p>\n<p>Consider providing laminated glass to meet safety glazing requirements in lieu of monolithic fully tempered glass.<\/p>\n<p>If these alternative options are not available for the project, and monolithic, fully tempered glass is unavoidable, the authors recommend the following:<\/p>\n<ul>\n<li>heat-soak test all monolithic, fully tempered glass in accordance with EN-14179<\/li>\n<li>utilize reputable glass manufacturers and fabricators who will address the risks associated with the use of fully tempered glass<\/li>\n<li>require QA\/QC procedures of glass manufacturers to minimize risks of float glass contamination<\/li>\n<li>require factory logs documenting heat-soak testing of all monolithic, fully tempered glass on the project in accordance with EN-14179<\/li>\n<li>seek records of glass manufacturers\u2019 past spontaneous breakage events and how they were resolved<\/li>\n<\/ul>\n<h2>Conclusion<\/h2>\n<p>Although the percentage of buildings experiencing spontaneous breakage of fully tempered glass due to NiS inclusions is low, if a batch of glass is contaminated, the incidence of breakage on a particular building can be quite high. Since the likelihood of spontaneous fracture of fully tempered glass is unpredictable, the issue needs to be addressed on all buildings for which the use of monolithic, fully tempered glass is being considered. Consider the risk of spontaneous breakage of fully tempered glass as the exterior lite of an IGU installed in an all-glass high-rise in a heavily populated downtown environment above active sidewalks\u2014is this a tolerable risk the design and construction team is willing to take?<\/p>\n<p>Owners do not expect the glass on their buildings to fracture spontaneously, inviting injury and damage, nor should they. After nearly 70 years of manufacturing knowledge about the inherent susceptibility of fully tempered glass to NiS-induced spontaneous fracture, and almost 40 years after the issuance of the first technical bulletin on the subject, it is time to fully address the issue, which continues to plague the industry to this day. For most projects, there are viable alternatives to the use of monolithic, fully tempered glass. Where monolithic, fully tempered glass is absolutely required, there are techniques to minimize these inherent risks. All parties of the design and construction team need to have frank, early discussions about these inherent risks to foster informed decision-making for the project at hand.<\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Brandmeier.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-212658\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Brandmeier-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Brandmeier-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Brandmeier-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Brandmeier-500x500.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Brandmeier.jpg 543w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a>Christopher J. Brandmeier, PE, is a senior consulting engineer with Simpson Gumpertz &amp; Heger in Washington, D.C. Brandmeier holds bachelor and master of architectural engineering degrees from the Pennsylvania State University. He has more than 10 years of experience with curtain walls, custom glazing systems, structural glass, glass investigations, and glass re-glazing; as well as broad experience in new and rehabilitation design with various roofing and below-grade waterproofing systems. He can be reached at cjbrandmeier@sgh.com.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Jackson.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-212659\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Jackson-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Jackson-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Jackson-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Jackson-500x500.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Jackson.jpg 543w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a>John A. Jackson, AIA, is an associate principal at Simpson, Gumpertz &amp; Heger in Washington, D.C. Jackson holds bachelor of architecture and master of engineering (structural) degrees, from the Pennsylvania State University. He has more than 21 years of experience in building enclosure design and consulting, with particular expertise in curtain walls, custom glazing systems, structural glass, and glass investigations. He leads SGH\u2019s glass and glazing systems practice area, is an active member of the ASTM Subcommittee E06.52, <\/em>Glass Use in Buildings<em>, and regularly delivers lectures and publications on building enclosure design. He can be reached at jajackson@sgh.com.<\/em><\/p>\n<p><em><a href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Schwartz.jpg\"><img loading=\"lazy\" decoding=\"async\" class=\"alignright size-thumbnail wp-image-212660\" src=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Schwartz-150x150.jpg\" alt=\"\" width=\"150\" height=\"150\" srcset=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Schwartz-150x150.jpg 150w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Schwartz-300x300.jpg 300w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Schwartz-500x500.jpg 500w, https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2018\/07\/Headshot-Schwartz.jpg 543w\" sizes=\"auto, (max-width: 150px) 100vw, 150px\" \/><\/a>Thomas A. Schwartz is the retired former president and head of building technology at Simpson Gumpertz &amp; Heger in Boston, Mass. Schwartz holds a bachelor of science degree in civil engineering from the Tufts University and a master of science in materials engineering from the Massachusetts Institute of Technology. For more than 40 years, Schwartz has conducted field and laboratory investigations, and produced new and remedial designs for building enclosure systems, including curtain walls, glazing, roofing, waterproofing, and masonry. He has been active in national standards development and research on various topics related to the construction industry, is a fellow of ASTM International, and past chair of the ASTM board of directors. <\/em><\/p>\n","protected":false},"excerpt":{"rendered":"<p>Fully tempered glass offers designers certain advantages over annealed and heat-strengthened glass, including increased strength to resist imposed loads and thermal stresses, as well as a characteristic breakage pattern in a \u201crelatively safe\u201d manner; however, these features come at the cost of increased optical distortion and an often overlooked risk of spontaneous breakage in-service due to nickel sulfide inclusions.<\/p>\n","protected":false},"author":4887,"featured_media":212663,"comment_status":"open","ping_status":"closed","sticky":false,"template":"","format":"standard","meta":{"_acf_changed":false,"footnotes":""},"categories":[520,179,449,188,279,498,461],"tags":[1727,4552,4479,1198,4553,4554,4555,4556,4557,4558],"class_list":["post-65519","post","type-post","status-publish","format-standard","has-post-thumbnail","hentry","category-features","category-masterformat","category-uniformat","category-08-00-00-openings","category-08-80-00-glazing","category-b3060horizontal-openings","category-b30exterior-horizontal-enclosures","tag-08-81-00-glass-glazing","tag-annealed-glass","tag-b3060-90-horizontal-opening-supplementary-components","tag-division-08","tag-fully-tempered-glass","tag-heat-soak-testing","tag-heat-strengthened-glass","tag-nickel-sulfide","tag-safety-glazing","tag-spontaneous-fracture","entry"],"acf":[],"yoast_head":"<!-- This site is optimized with the Yoast SEO plugin v28.8 - https:\/\/yoast.com\/product\/yoast-seo-wordpress\/ -->\n<title>Fully tempered glass and spontaneous fracture - The Construction Specifier<\/title>\n<meta name=\"description\" content=\"Fully tempered glass offers certain advantages over annealed and heat-strengthened glass, but designers should also be aware of the potential risks.\" \/>\n<meta name=\"robots\" content=\"index, follow, max-snippet:-1, max-image-preview:large, max-video-preview:-1\" \/>\n<link rel=\"canonical\" href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/\" \/>\n<link rel=\"next\" href=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/2\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:locale\" content=\"en_US\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:type\" content=\"article\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:title\" content=\"Fully tempered glass and spontaneous fracture - The Construction Specifier\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:description\" content=\"Fully tempered glass offers certain advantages over annealed and heat-strengthened glass, but designers should also be aware of the potential risks.\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:url\" content=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:site_name\" content=\"The Construction Specifier\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:published_time\" content=\"2025-09-24T13:55:11+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"article:modified_time\" content=\"2025-09-26T17:41:14+00:00\" \/>\n<meta property=\"og:image\" content=\"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:width\" content=\"1024\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:height\" content=\"683\" \/>\n\t<meta property=\"og:image:type\" content=\"image\/jpeg\" \/>\n<meta name=\"author\" content=\"Samantha Ashenhurst\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:card\" content=\"summary_large_image\" \/>\n<meta name=\"twitter:label1\" content=\"Written by\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data1\" content=\"Samantha Ashenhurst\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:label2\" content=\"Est. reading time\" \/>\n\t<meta name=\"twitter:data2\" content=\"28 minutes\" \/>\n<script type=\"application\/ld+json\" class=\"yoast-schema-graph\">{\"@context\":\"https:\\\/\\\/schema.org\",\"@graph\":[{\"@type\":\"Article\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/#article\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/\"},\"author\":{\"name\":\"Samantha Ashenhurst\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/08c7087dff45ca0529eac7675313f4c7\"},\"headline\":\"Fully tempered glass and spontaneous fracture\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-24T13:55:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-26T17:41:14+00:00\",\"mainEntityOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/\"},\"wordCount\":5618,\"commentCount\":1,\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/#organization\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg\",\"keywords\":[\"08 81 00 Glass Glazing\",\"Annealed glass\",\"B3060.90\u2013Horizontal Opening Supplementary Components\",\"Division 08\",\"Fully tempered glass\",\"Heat-soak testing\",\"Heat-strengthened glass\",\"Nickel sulfide\",\"Safety glazing\",\"Spontaneous fracture\"],\"articleSection\":[\"Features\",\"MasterFormat\",\"UniFormat\",\"08 00 00 Openings\",\"08 80 00 Glazing\",\"B3060\u2212Horizontal Openings\",\"B30\u2212Exterior Horizontal Enclosures\"],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"CommentAction\",\"name\":\"Comment\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/#respond\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"WebPage\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/\",\"name\":\"Fully tempered glass and spontaneous fracture - The Construction Specifier\",\"isPartOf\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/#website\"},\"primaryImageOfPage\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/#primaryimage\"},\"thumbnailUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg\",\"datePublished\":\"2025-09-24T13:55:11+00:00\",\"dateModified\":\"2025-09-26T17:41:14+00:00\",\"description\":\"Fully tempered glass offers certain advantages over annealed and heat-strengthened glass, but designers should also be aware of the potential risks.\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"ReadAction\",\"target\":[\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/\"]}]},{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\\\/#primaryimage\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2025\\\/09\\\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg\",\"width\":1024,\"height\":683},{\"@type\":\"WebSite\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/#website\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/\",\"name\":\"The Construction Specifier\",\"description\":\"Solutions for the Construction Industry\",\"publisher\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/#organization\"},\"potentialAction\":[{\"@type\":\"SearchAction\",\"target\":{\"@type\":\"EntryPoint\",\"urlTemplate\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/?s={search_term_string}\"},\"query-input\":{\"@type\":\"PropertyValueSpecification\",\"valueRequired\":true,\"valueName\":\"search_term_string\"}}],\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\"},{\"@type\":\"Organization\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/#organization\",\"name\":\"The Construction Specifier\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/\",\"logo\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/CS_Logo_BW_LR.jpg\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/wp-content\\\/uploads\\\/2017\\\/09\\\/CS_Logo_BW_LR.jpg\",\"width\":288,\"height\":70,\"caption\":\"The Construction Specifier\"},\"image\":{\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/logo\\\/image\\\/\"}},{\"@type\":\"Person\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/#\\\/schema\\\/person\\\/08c7087dff45ca0529eac7675313f4c7\",\"name\":\"Samantha Ashenhurst\",\"image\":{\"@type\":\"ImageObject\",\"inLanguage\":\"en-US\",\"@id\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e9ba5e76cde0e7a193d6bc090976285aeddf1bb7bbaab73da8c8b642a5d494eb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e9ba5e76cde0e7a193d6bc090976285aeddf1bb7bbaab73da8c8b642a5d494eb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"contentUrl\":\"https:\\\/\\\/secure.gravatar.com\\\/avatar\\\/e9ba5e76cde0e7a193d6bc090976285aeddf1bb7bbaab73da8c8b642a5d494eb?s=96&d=mm&r=g\",\"caption\":\"Samantha Ashenhurst\"},\"url\":\"https:\\\/\\\/www.constructionspecifier.com\\\/author\\\/sashenhurstkenilworth-com\\\/\"}]}<\/script>\n<!-- \/ Yoast SEO plugin. -->","yoast_head_json":{"title":"Fully tempered glass and spontaneous fracture - The Construction Specifier","description":"Fully tempered glass offers certain advantages over annealed and heat-strengthened glass, but designers should also be aware of the potential risks.","robots":{"index":"index","follow":"follow","max-snippet":"max-snippet:-1","max-image-preview":"max-image-preview:large","max-video-preview":"max-video-preview:-1"},"canonical":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/","next":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/2\/","og_locale":"en_US","og_type":"article","og_title":"Fully tempered glass and spontaneous fracture - The Construction Specifier","og_description":"Fully tempered glass offers certain advantages over annealed and heat-strengthened glass, but designers should also be aware of the potential risks.","og_url":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/","og_site_name":"The Construction Specifier","article_published_time":"2025-09-24T13:55:11+00:00","article_modified_time":"2025-09-26T17:41:14+00:00","og_image":[{"width":1024,"height":683,"url":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg","type":"image\/jpeg"}],"author":"Samantha Ashenhurst","twitter_card":"summary_large_image","twitter_misc":{"Written by":"Samantha Ashenhurst","Est. reading time":"28 minutes"},"schema":{"@context":"https:\/\/schema.org","@graph":[{"@type":"Article","@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/#article","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/"},"author":{"name":"Samantha Ashenhurst","@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/#\/schema\/person\/08c7087dff45ca0529eac7675313f4c7"},"headline":"Fully tempered glass and spontaneous fracture","datePublished":"2025-09-24T13:55:11+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-26T17:41:14+00:00","mainEntityOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/"},"wordCount":5618,"commentCount":1,"publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/#organization"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg","keywords":["08 81 00 Glass Glazing","Annealed glass","B3060.90\u2013Horizontal Opening Supplementary Components","Division 08","Fully tempered glass","Heat-soak testing","Heat-strengthened glass","Nickel sulfide","Safety glazing","Spontaneous fracture"],"articleSection":["Features","MasterFormat","UniFormat","08 00 00 Openings","08 80 00 Glazing","B3060\u2212Horizontal Openings","B30\u2212Exterior Horizontal Enclosures"],"inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"CommentAction","name":"Comment","target":["https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/#respond"]}]},{"@type":"WebPage","@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/","url":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/","name":"Fully tempered glass and spontaneous fracture - The Construction Specifier","isPartOf":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/#website"},"primaryImageOfPage":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/#primaryimage"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/#primaryimage"},"thumbnailUrl":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg","datePublished":"2025-09-24T13:55:11+00:00","dateModified":"2025-09-26T17:41:14+00:00","description":"Fully tempered glass offers certain advantages over annealed and heat-strengthened glass, but designers should also be aware of the potential risks.","inLanguage":"en-US","potentialAction":[{"@type":"ReadAction","target":["https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/"]}]},{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/fully-tempered-glass-and-spontaneous-fracture\/#primaryimage","url":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2025\/09\/Featured-image1-1-scaled.jpg","width":1024,"height":683},{"@type":"WebSite","@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/#website","url":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/","name":"The Construction Specifier","description":"Solutions for the Construction Industry","publisher":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/#organization"},"potentialAction":[{"@type":"SearchAction","target":{"@type":"EntryPoint","urlTemplate":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/?s={search_term_string}"},"query-input":{"@type":"PropertyValueSpecification","valueRequired":true,"valueName":"search_term_string"}}],"inLanguage":"en-US"},{"@type":"Organization","@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/#organization","name":"The Construction Specifier","url":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/","logo":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/","url":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/CS_Logo_BW_LR.jpg","contentUrl":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-content\/uploads\/2017\/09\/CS_Logo_BW_LR.jpg","width":288,"height":70,"caption":"The Construction Specifier"},"image":{"@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/#\/schema\/logo\/image\/"}},{"@type":"Person","@id":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/#\/schema\/person\/08c7087dff45ca0529eac7675313f4c7","name":"Samantha Ashenhurst","image":{"@type":"ImageObject","inLanguage":"en-US","@id":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e9ba5e76cde0e7a193d6bc090976285aeddf1bb7bbaab73da8c8b642a5d494eb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","url":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e9ba5e76cde0e7a193d6bc090976285aeddf1bb7bbaab73da8c8b642a5d494eb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","contentUrl":"https:\/\/secure.gravatar.com\/avatar\/e9ba5e76cde0e7a193d6bc090976285aeddf1bb7bbaab73da8c8b642a5d494eb?s=96&d=mm&r=g","caption":"Samantha Ashenhurst"},"url":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/author\/sashenhurstkenilworth-com\/"}]}},"views":97470,"publishpress_future_workflow_manual_trigger":{"enabledWorkflows":[]},"_links":{"self":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65519","targetHints":{"allow":["GET"]}}],"collection":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/posts"}],"about":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/types\/post"}],"author":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/users\/4887"}],"replies":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/comments?post=65519"}],"version-history":[{"count":6,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65519\/revisions"}],"predecessor-version":[{"id":212674,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/posts\/65519\/revisions\/212674"}],"wp:featuredmedia":[{"embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/media\/212663"}],"wp:attachment":[{"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/media?parent=65519"}],"wp:term":[{"taxonomy":"category","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/categories?post=65519"},{"taxonomy":"post_tag","embeddable":true,"href":"https:\/\/www.constructionspecifier.com\/wp-json-v2\/wp\/v2\/tags?post=65519"}],"curies":[{"name":"wp","href":"https:\/\/api.w.org\/{rel}","templated":true}]}}