| Briefly… |
|
|
| |
 |
| |
| New tower at University of California earns acclaim for restoration |
| |
|
The newly renamed Pritzker Hall Psychology Tower at the University of California, Los Angeles (UCLA) has earned acclaim for the restoration and renovation of the historical campus building.
|
| |
|
» Read more |
| |
| DEMO-CASTS ON DEMAND |
|
Get to know the inherent benefits of single-source WRB/AB systems
|
| Georgia Pacific Demo-Cast |
|
|
|
| |
|
A Concise Look at NEIS and Standard Development
|
| NECA Demo-Cast |
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| Featured |
|
|
| |
| Project News |
|
|
| |
| Inside CSI |
 |
|
| |
| |
|
FIRE-RATED DRYWALL REPAIR & HOT PATCH? |
|
Construction today offers many challenges from estimating projects through completing final punch lists. Milestones, completion deadlines and profitable projects are also more challenging, but having a better understanding of installed fire-rated barriers and repairs will help meet these deadlines.
|
|
JOIN THE DISCUSSION » |
| |
|
| |
| |
| 'SHORT FORM' SPECIFICATIONS - AMOUNT OF DETAIL TO INCLUDE? |
|
I'm wading out into this very grey area of looking for guidance on how much information is appropriate to put into both 'outline' and 'short form' versions of specifications. Previously, I've only issued full spec sections at all design and documentation phases, incrementally providing more detail on the materials, systems and quality. Does anyone have any general rules of thumb in what to include within each version? Such as, submittal and mock-up requirements should never be included within outline specs but should always be included within short form specs. Any advice on how to best ensure that all costs are covered within short form specs? |
|
JOIN THE DISCUSSION » |
| |
|
|
|
| |
| Missed this from the web? |
|
|
|
|
